Posts: 80
|
Post by zombiesurvivalcat on Feb 7, 2016 8:16:51 GMT 10
Hiiiii Any way of cheating competely destroys the creepyness, suspense and tension of a survival horror game. And no aspect of survival and horror remains with unlimited ammo, just plain stupid cheating and guns blazing with unlimited ammo and blasting away every zombie *yawn * Is there any way to remove the unlimited ammo feature of the rocket launcher (make it have 1 rocket in the magazine), and make the Samurai Edge using the standart handgun bullets to have a second and better and enhanced handgun (like the upgraded handgun with the stock and the triple-fire-burst from the Resident Evil 2 Leon game?) Removing this stupid and unrealistic unlimited ammo arcade feature from the game would extremely enhance immersion, tension and survival horror aspects! But I don`t know how to do this by myself, so some help to gain the survival horror the terror the fear while sneaking through the old mansion back (instead of having stupid unlimited arcade cheater weapons in the item-box.....................) would be nice.Thanks
|
|
|
Post by UltimateWeapon on Feb 7, 2016 20:44:44 GMT 10
You could pretend the R.L has one rocket. Fire it once, put it in your item box, and never touch it again. I don't know about the handgun though, but using cheat engine might help you crack down which address has the ammo for it.
|
|
Posts: 11
|
Post by DEadLyToe on Mar 5, 2017 16:43:06 GMT 10
Yeah I would also like to figure this out as well. If anyone has any input that may help as to how we would achieve this that would be appreciated. I have tried modifying the arc of Chris's handgun to see if I could completely swap the gun with the samurai edge but accomplished nothing other than overwriting the skin. My guess is that the weapons information and traits are located in more than just one arc file such as wep0b/wep02 and the hardest part wouldn't be overwriting it but actually locating it. Just assuming you did find which file or files store the weapons traits actually finding the right value to modify would most likely be pretty tedious, but then again I could be wrong.
|
|