Meni palci nesto bride zlo neko amo ide Ma ko da je, otkljucajte
Posts: 1,357
Original Join Date: Mar 7 2010
|
Post by moca357 on Feb 9, 2017 9:55:28 GMT 10
Aren't you one little miserable excuse of a flaming troll? I wander if you are like that with people face-to-face? Or are you just courageous when typing on keyboard? Either way, go and get a life. Oh, and be careful. If I'm a fat angel, I just might land on your sorry head and make a little bloody stain... I'm going to give you a chance since maybe you where in the midst of typing already when I made my post, but read my colored post above and proceed accordingly. Yes. I was in the middle of typing. Should I remove that post?
|
|
ピアス・ザ・ヘヴンズ!
"Man shouldn't have to live on carbohydrates alone, complex or otherwise" *Spike*
Posts: 6,846
Original Join Date: Dec 10 2009
|
Post by ToCool74 on Feb 9, 2017 9:57:15 GMT 10
the problem is i didnt attacked or mention names look and my first post.and this moca fat bully started to piss me off. if its about ban ok i dont care but i cant stand those type of guys trying to attack from nowhere.and play the heroes from nothing. Did you just ignore my post? Warn bar raised, discussing the topic again will result in it being raised again and a ban, tread carefully and get back to the topic. moca its already posted now so your fine, but do not post anything on the subject again.
|
|
I AM A NEWBEE :P hi and nice to meet you guys :P
Posts: 98
|
Post by mariostako19891992 on Feb 9, 2017 10:04:08 GMT 10
I snorted out my soda reading this. God damn. Back to my original point: RE has never been about simple people in horror. What with almost everybody having military, police or government training with regards to firearms and the like, pretty much every beloved protagonist in the series has ALWAYS been at an advantage in a survival horror. So it worries me that people praising RE7 for "Going back to the premise of ordinary people in a simple house" haven't actually played the earliest games recently. Claire, Jill, Leon, Chris. All had experience, all weren't equal to civilians in terms of experience. Hell, if you believe certain implications about Ethan's backstory, he's not ordinary with regards to experience either. There's also the "Woo, back in a house!" thing. Perhaps it's just me, but the Baker Residence is nowhere near the size, scale, or complexity of the Spencer Mansion. That, and RE2 is the most adored RE game by most people, and it was never in a house. Why the sudden backtrack, fandom? I don't know. People have a right to praise the game but there's a problem when the game is praised for something it technically doesn't do. Ethan must be infected with the virus.he regenerate fast if you see when he lost his hand or his leg ,and something weird happen with umbrella i am sure.i didnt take the game for the back in the house but about the game play.i had to many years to play a game saving ammo,or health items in order to survive.solving weird puzzles without a sense,and killing not the stronger but strong monsters in someway for a threat.so it was like something new refreshing for me.it was shot i guess without story development too much on the heroes. but i read that they stopped the game and they started the vr strategy at 2015 so they didnt end the whole game.i wish it had more enemies and variety of enemies.but its ok.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 10:07:23 GMT 10
I snorted out my soda reading this. God damn. Back to my original point: RE has never been about simple people in horror. What with almost everybody having military, police or government training with regards to firearms and the like, pretty much every beloved protagonist in the series has ALWAYS been at an advantage in a survival horror. So it worries me that people praising RE7 for "Going back to the premise of ordinary people in a simple house" haven't actually played the earliest games recently. Claire, Jill, Leon, Chris. All had experience, all weren't equal to civilians in terms of experience. Hell, if you believe certain implications about Ethan's backstory, he's not ordinary with regards to experience either. There's also the "Woo, back in a house!" thing. Perhaps it's just me, but the Baker Residence is nowhere near the size, scale, or complexity of the Spencer Mansion. That, and RE2 is the most adored RE game by most people, and it was never in a house. Why the sudden backtrack, fandom? I don't know. People have a right to praise the game but there's a problem when the game is praised for something it technically doesn't do. Ethan must be infected with the virus.he regenerate fast if you see when he lost his hand or his leg ,and something weird happen with umbrella i am sure.i didnt take the game for the back in the house but about the game play.i had to many years to play a game saving ammo,or health items in order to survive.solving weird puzzles without a sense,and not the stronger but strong monsters.so it was like something new refreshing for me.it was shot i guess without story development too much on the heroes.but i read that the stoped the game and they started the vr strategy so they didnt end the whole game. ...Kinda missing the point of my post, but okay.
|
|
I AM A NEWBEE :P hi and nice to meet you guys :P
Posts: 98
|
Post by mariostako19891992 on Feb 9, 2017 10:14:29 GMT 10
yeah you said about the hype from some gamers about the "back to home " idea but i am no looking the game about the similarities with the older games i talked about me how i saw a refreshed game .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 10:31:59 GMT 10
yeah you said about the hype from some gamers about the "back to home " idea but i am no looking the game about the similarities with the older games i talked about me how i saw a refreshed game . That's... nice, I guess? Has no relevance at all to my point, though.
|
|
I AM A NEWBEE :P hi and nice to meet you guys :P
Posts: 98
|
Post by mariostako19891992 on Feb 9, 2017 10:34:19 GMT 10
and your point is?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 10:37:07 GMT 10
Did... you read the post? "I don't know. People have a right to praise the game but there's a problem when the game is praised for something it technically doesn't do." It's not about what YOU like about the game, I never asked that. It's about "Hey, maybe people should actually look at the older games before comparing 7 to them in these TWO AREAS I HIGHLIGHTED SPECIFICALLY." I will even repost the entire comment and highlight the relevant sections. I snorted out my soda reading this. God damn. Back to my original point: RE has never been about simple people in horror. What with almost everybody having military, police or government training with regards to firearms and the like, pretty much every beloved protagonist in the series has ALWAYS been at an advantage in a survival horror.So it worries me that people praising RE7 for "Going back to the premise of ordinary people in a simple house" haven't actually played the earliest games recently. Claire, Jill, Leon, Chris. All had experience, all weren't equal to civilians in terms of experience. Hell, if you believe certain implications about Ethan's backstory, he's not ordinary with regards to experience either. There's also the "Woo, back in a house!" thing. Perhaps it's just me, but the Baker Residence is nowhere near the size, scale, or complexity of the Spencer Mansion. That, and RE2 is the most adored RE game by most people, and it was never in a house. Why the sudden backtrack, fandom? I don't know. People have a right to praise the game but there's a problem when the game is praised for something it technically doesn't do.
|
|
I AM A NEWBEE :P hi and nice to meet you guys :P
Posts: 98
|
Post by mariostako19891992 on Feb 9, 2017 10:44:41 GMT 10
yes i understand your point capcom brings this hype and some purist started to praise the game about that also and some new comers cause its more playable from the classics for them.but its for now the closest like idea from what we had in from the last games in the survival horror aspect.and also fans try to praise it to that way to make capcom move in a more survival horror aspect.something near to the classics.anyway goodnight.seeya guys.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 10:47:56 GMT 10
yes i understand your point capcom brings this hype and some purist started to praise the game about that also and some new comers cause its more playable from the classics from them.but its for now the closest like idea from what we had in from the last games in the survival horror aspect.and also fans try to praise it to that way to make capcom move in a more survival horror aspect.something near to the classics.anyway goodnight.seeya guys. >"I understand your point" >Proceeds to go on a tangent that proves you didn't understand my point.
|
|
I AM A NEWBEE :P hi and nice to meet you guys :P
Posts: 98
|
Post by mariostako19891992 on Feb 9, 2017 11:13:24 GMT 10
in the first games the heroes are simple people.not rambos.even if they are special force team,they are vulnerable.also in the remake they didnt let to much things out about their past. it was more gameplay and not too much cutscenes for immersion. the heroes where empty in the remake with cheese dialogs. if you play chris part or jill,you will see pieces from the story from the files in the mansion.and all was about the residents ,the virus, and the mystery/conspyracy theory.at the gameplay your beloved heroes are weak they cant even shoot zombies in the head.also they dying after 3 bites.we talk about vulnerabilty how helpless you are.resident evil 5,6 had taken away all this.and the game in someway came back in different first person perpective to reminds us that capcom can make survival horror games in a new aproach.thats all.we wanted a vulnarable hero in a abandoned place.like the old games.even if some people praise this in some way like the spencer mansion. cause its about a abandon house ,a new mystery ,and a campy evil dead violence atmosphere .by the way its a solid survival horror game with new heroes for something refreshing.goodnight and i give up on you too .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 11:23:15 GMT 10
So it took me a full 8 minutes to actually understand any of that.
Nothing you say is worth responding to, just overly stretched arguments that don't have much relevance to the topic I'm discussing. What does cheese dialogue, ability to hit head shots, HP, and atmosphere have to do with "None of the RE protagonists are civilians" and "People praise RE7 for the wrong thing".
I give up with you.
|
|
That's what I do. I game and I know things.
Posts: 104
|
Post by A Jaded Lizard on Feb 9, 2017 12:22:47 GMT 10
So, anyway.
I'm curious if anyone else spotted a file or background note I missed, but I realized something after going through the tanker the second time. Namely, that this thing is frakking huge. And clearly an oil tanker. So my question is this: how the fuck does an oil tanker that big run aground in Louisiana and no one fucking notice?
I know we have some other American in this thread. Do you remember the BP Oil Spill? Do you remember what a dog and pony show that was? Did I just miss a file, or did Capcom not ever mention why no one responded to what would've surely been an ecological disaster on par in-universe with the destruction of Raccoon City almost twenty years earlier?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 12:35:08 GMT 10
So, anyway. I'm curious if anyone else spotted a file or background note I missed, but I realized something after going through the tanker the second time. Namely, that this thing is frakking huge. And clearly an oil tanker. So my question is this: how the fuck does an oil tanker that big run aground in Louisiana and no one fucking notice? I know we have some other American in this thread. Do you remember the BP Oil Spill? Do you remember what a dog and pony show that was? Did I just miss a file, or did Capcom not ever mention why no one responded to what would've surely been an ecological disaster on par in-universe with the destruction of Raccoon City almost twenty years earlier? Capcom writing. Only Raccoon City happened in the media, everything else is negligible at best.
|
|
That's what I do. I game and I know things.
Posts: 104
|
Post by A Jaded Lizard on Feb 9, 2017 12:44:16 GMT 10
So, anyway. I'm curious if anyone else spotted a file or background note I missed, but I realized something after going through the tanker the second time. Namely, that this thing is frakking huge. And clearly an oil tanker. So my question is this: how the fuck does an oil tanker that big run aground in Louisiana and no one fucking notice? I know we have some other American in this thread. Do you remember the BP Oil Spill? Do you remember what a dog and pony show that was? Did I just miss a file, or did Capcom not ever mention why no one responded to what would've surely been an ecological disaster on par in-universe with the destruction of Raccoon City almost twenty years earlier? Capcom writing. Only Raccoon City happened in the media, everything else is negligible at best. See, I've always thought Capcom has done a pretty decent job of world-building, such as the American President resigning in disgrace after the destruction of Raccoon City, the US spearheading the coalition of the willing against BOW warfare with the FBC, and American and Russian cooperation in the Eastern Slav Republic. I don't really feel like this is so much just par for the course for Capcom as really disappointingly bad writing from a team that's usually pretty on the ball.
|
|