Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2015 14:29:10 GMT 10
It's not fair not having Tomb Raider Definitive Edition on PC, I mean 4K + Definitive Edition Graphics would look beautiful, console players have requested to have tressfx hair quality, they got it. But what about us? Why don't we get definitive edition, despite the fact we got monster gaming rigs ready to explode with graphics to render? If you agree with me, please sign this, as this will be forwarded to SE once I think it has enough signatures! Link: PetitionThanks everyone for support and always do comment your opinion on this...
|
|
Always on a quest...
Posts: 3,739
Original Join Date: Apr 6, 2013
|
Post by ΛLISTΞR on Nov 20, 2015 18:34:03 GMT 10
Never gonna happen
there would be hardly any change from playing on ultra graphics. (Infact it would look better graphics wise)
and as for tress fx, They got it because they could now handle it.
PC users already could.
+With the ROTTR PC release so soon they definitely won't, to focus on that.
|
|
Posts: 6,004
Original Join Date: May 6 2011
|
Post by ThatGayModder™ on Nov 20, 2015 23:47:33 GMT 10
i want rise of the tomb raider for PC and PS4 first
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2015 3:35:39 GMT 10
All the DE did was give lara a new face and take advantage of the new console's slightly stronger power.
TR2013 on Ultra is already vastly prettier.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2015 14:45:49 GMT 10
I personally think they should concentrate on ROTR first then release definitive edition. Yeah they did wrecked up Lara's face in DE, many people called her *Lara's Big Sister* XD Everything in DE is perfect expect from Lara, and some other characters texture, such as Mathias's hair. TRESSFX is more better in terms of quality of it. It seems like they have sharped the hair quality, and of cause console have AMD GPU that's the whole reason why DE doesn't go slow, since TRESSFX IS a AMD feature, for those who have Nvidia (and myself) that uses TRESSFX, good luck maintaining 60FPS, well GTX 980, 970, 980 TI can have a stable 60FPS+
But to come to think about DE, it's unfair, games are made from computers, I'm sure they could convert the files from next gen consoles to PC compatible files. Probably increases the game size too... But it's nice to see other people opinions! Se can put DE on STEAM, if many people are requesting it, and more likely when ROTR is out for STEAM + If the petition gets enough signatures.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2015 23:28:19 GMT 10
DE would be a massive waste of effort for something ALREADY ATTAINABLE.
We don't need it on PC.
|
|
Ada... Ada Wong :D
Posts: 9,898
Original Join Date: Aug 21, 2008
|
Post by EvilLord on Nov 24, 2015 1:29:49 GMT 10
DE would be a massive waste of effort for something ALREADY ATTAINABLE. We don't need it on PC. what we NEED is a fixed TR and RTR to be not as buggy as old TR thats what we need right now am i Right or AM I RIGHT XD
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2015 18:21:05 GMT 10
That can be done with a patch, which they won't do because TR2013 wasn't deemed profitable.
|
|
Ada... Ada Wong :D
Posts: 9,898
Original Join Date: Aug 21, 2008
|
Post by EvilLord on Nov 25, 2015 3:34:51 GMT 10
That can be done with a patch, which they won't do because TR2013 wasn't deemed profitable. yeah sadly they didnt care about Nvidia cards back then i hope with RTR its fixed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2015 8:39:05 GMT 10
I'm not fussed either way.
ROTTR sucked, I doubt I'll finish it on PC.
|
|
From my experience, yes.
Posts: 420
|
Post by sharontubul on Nov 30, 2015 1:20:46 GMT 10
If they cared it would have came out when the console versions did.
What we have on PC now is a sub-par version of the game as it is obviously not the latest one. It should have been on PC and I find it off-putting to play the now-outdated PC version.
|
|