Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2017 17:36:18 GMT 10
That was promotional material. Chances are it never happened in canon. That is most probably canon. From the looks of it, this video is jist moments after clancy gets attacked. Pete talks about Audre's dead body (Describes he blood comin out from Audre's eyes) and further says that he can't find Clancy. It seems like Jack took clancy instantly before Pete was able to reach him. And Pete's probably knocked out by Mia. (Even though the ghost body is actually Evelines). The ghost that haunts us in the demo is actually Eveline creating vision on Clancy's mind, thus disappearing within split seconds and not being noticed by Pete and Audre. We can also see Eveline standing right behind pete while climbing down the ladder. So I dobt know if it was Eveline or Mia. Pete and Clancy were much better than Mia and Ethane. Then you just proved the point that playing as Pete would be incredibly boring. There's not that much time between the demo and his death.
|
|
Sleeping
Posts: 454
|
Post by SAMI on Feb 11, 2017 19:35:40 GMT 10
That is most probably canon. From the looks of it, this video is jist moments after clancy gets attacked. Pete talks about Audre's dead body (Describes he blood comin out from Audre's eyes) and further says that he can't find Clancy. It seems like Jack took clancy instantly before Pete was able to reach him. And Pete's probably knocked out by Mia. (Even though the ghost body is actually Evelines). The ghost that haunts us in the demo is actually Eveline creating vision on Clancy's mind, thus disappearing within split seconds and not being noticed by Pete and Audre. We can also see Eveline standing right behind pete while climbing down the ladder. So I dobt know if it was Eveline or Mia. Pete and Clancy were much better than Mia and Ethane. Then you just proved the point that playing as Pete would be incredibly boring. There's not that much time between the demo and his death. Considering how short the banned videos are (30 mins?), it wont be a problem at all I suppose. But yeah, it will be boring like Clancy. I rather have Zoe and Lucas videos.
|
|
Posts: 24
|
Post by tweaker61 on Feb 11, 2017 20:00:19 GMT 10
I mean Its Resident evil, you can kill a person doesn't mean they wont come back though. But yeaaa I wouldn't count on it.
|
|
Posts: 738
Original Join Date: May 20 2009
|
Post by Overseer on Feb 11, 2017 22:52:32 GMT 10
Thank God I didn't buy this game. Bring on REmake2 Capcom. And please don't fuck up Claire or Ada again, these poor characters have been through enough in your games. I don't know about that, track record seems to be whenever Claire's in a game they manage to fuck stuff up. (There's edited lines in Bio2 for the record as well as cut stuff from CV that should be common knowledge now, I don't even need to get into the REV2 stuff as you've heard me go on and on about it). To me, it just seems concerning there has been no statements even in simple text form to confirm any progress since the initial press releases. The last time that kind of happened was when things got cancelled or delayed, so either way it's just kind of iffy to me. Even more iffy with 7 in general too. And also - the banned videos being pretty short seems pretty crappy to me. I don't know, I would prefer something longer in general but I may just have a bias as I prefer longer games over shorter ones. Probably because games are expensive over my way and it feels like bit of a rip-off when you have minimal story content and then short DLC you have to fork out for too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2017 23:31:08 GMT 10
Thank God I didn't buy this game. Bring on REmake2 Capcom. And please don't fuck up Claire or Ada again, these poor characters have been through enough in your games. I don't know about that, track record seems to be whenever Claire's in a game they manage to fuck stuff up. (There's edited lines in Bio2 for the record as well as cut stuff from CV that should be common knowledge now, I don't even need to get into the REV2 stuff as you've heard me go on and on about it). To me, it just seems concerning there has been no statements even in simple text form to confirm any progress since the initial press releases. The last time that kind of happened was when things got cancelled or delayed, so either way it's just kind of iffy to me. Even more iffy with 7 in general too. And also - the banned videos being pretty short seems pretty crappy to me. I don't know, I would prefer something longer in general but I may just have a bias as I prefer longer games over shorter ones. Probably because games are expensive over my way and it feels like bit of a rip-off when you have minimal story content and then short DLC you have to fork out for too. Claire "I have a romance subplot in every game I'm in barring RE2" Redfield. Knowing Capcom they'll try to cram something like that down our throats in RE2. Also please god, I don't know if Ali Hillis voiced Claire in Rev2, but if she did, don't ever bring her back. You can clear all of Banned Footage Vol. 1 in about 2 hours, so it is kind of a rip-off. Especially jarring since I just got done clearing all of Battleborn's DLC, which took me about 20hrs because holy fuck Gearbox know how to make things replayable. I get the feeling this content WAS planned for the release, but was snipped to re-sell. They even cleared all mention of it from the files. What's worse, though, is that this content is all IRRELEVANT, so it's not only short in time but it's a WASTE of time too.
|
|
Posts: 738
Original Join Date: May 20 2009
|
Post by Overseer on Feb 11, 2017 23:54:49 GMT 10
Claire "I have a romance subplot in every game I'm in barring RE2" Redfield. Knowing Capcom they'll try to cram something like that down our throats in RE2. Also please god, I don't know if Ali Hillis voiced Claire in Rev2, but if she did, don't ever bring her back. You can clear all of Banned Footage Vol. 1 in about 2 hours, so it is kind of a rip-off. Especially jarring since I just got done clearing all of Battleborn's DLC, which took me about 20hrs because holy fuck Gearbox know how to make things replayable. I get the feeling this content WAS planned for the release, but was snipped to re-sell. They even cleared all mention of it from the files. What's worse, though, is that this content is all IRRELEVANT, so it's not only short in time but it's a WASTE of time too. Unfortunately the thing in REV2 was very forced outside of Japan. In the JP side it is very business-like and Claire's weird reaction to Natalia is purely due to PTSD related problems because Claire repeatedly had lines about it not happening all over again, talking about the prison cell and seeing Natalia run away from them. Claire also has a death line specific to the prison area that she breaks down with a "No.... not here....." but it would've made more sense with the fact that the game originally opened with Claire needing to use a lighter again in the jail cell because the area originally had no power. There's even a tutorial that lists lighter, until Claire loses it and Moira picks up a flashlight. The forced romance in the English & international versions of REV2 is ridiculous. Neil is a piece of shit. Moira doesn't make any reference to Neil being Claire's boyfriend, but is actually asking Claire if she's okay and asking Claire if Neil seems kind of off to her. Moira also unintentionally stresses Claire out even more, which is why Claire gets a little frustrated and tells Moira to shut up and keep moving through areas. There's a lot of things in the game that piss me off in terms of differences. So I would really hope for nothing like that to happen in 2, and I would like the conversation with Marvin that was edited out on the topic of S.T.A.R.S. and what the survivors did (warning people) after the fact until they all left Raccoon because Marvin was one of the few that listened in general to them and was useful with information at the early stage of the game. As for the DLC - that's really shitty to hear that it only takes two hours. Though also given that ALL of the DLC was pretty much listed in the trial edition/demo data, I pulled the Nightmare DLC name reference and stuff before from it kind of proves it was pulled from release in a way. I don't know, in contrast like at least it's been admitted that Final Fantasy XV wasn't complete on launch and that they need to finish DLC, especially with VO recording sessions but the Bio7 stuff all seems to have been complete as there were trophy references and things in the data in general so it just seems very... Capcom as usual.
|
|
That's what I do. I game and I know things.
Posts: 104
|
Post by A Jaded Lizard on Feb 12, 2017 8:54:24 GMT 10
Yea in terms of unlockables this game more than any main game in the series let me down tremendously. Only getting a new gun and new difficulty felt incredibly lacking in comparison to what we have been getting for a while now such as Raid Mode,Mercenaries mode,Battle Game, just to name a few good modes that added soooooooooooooooo much replay value to the game, this was a very huge mistake on Capcom's considering how short this game actually is, I beat it and felt absolutely no desire to even pick it up since then, at least with RE6 I actually felt the need to keep playing it after beating is lackluster campaign mode simply because of the unlockable modes it offered. The only thing Capcom is doing even the slightest bit right as far as endgame replayability goes is the FREE Not a Hero DLC (the paid ones seem lacking and boring to me and not worth the money), but even that is not going to add the level of replay and fun that modes like Raid Mode and Mercenaries mode brought us. Especially if you're a fool like me and preordered: doing that gets you Madhouse by default (why you'd want to do that to yourself to begin with is beyond me, given how it seems to have been a deliberate attempt to make the game broken). Other preorder bonuses are some extra healing items you can't access until you get to the main house (so you're still fucked in Madhouse before then), and something called the "Defense Coin" which has benefits I can't really discern. I assume it debuffs enemy attacks, but that's never really clear; on the positive side Mia has access to it as well when you're playing as her, but that also means I'm not really sure how much easier it makes the game. Feels more like it should be a bonus for beating the game once, the same way Articles of Defense (or whatever) is. Given that you get the Samurai Edge on any NG+ save you start, even if you've not beaten that difficulty yet, it seems kind of OP, as there's no reason not to play the easier difficulties first before you try Madhouse. It's like they were adding difficulty with one hand and then removing it with the other, and I can't really help but feel like it was all half baked.
|
|
That's what I do. I game and I know things.
Posts: 104
|
Post by A Jaded Lizard on Feb 12, 2017 9:00:27 GMT 10
And also - the banned videos being pretty short seems pretty crappy to me. I don't know, I would prefer something longer in general but I may just have a bias as I prefer longer games over shorter ones. Probably because games are expensive over my way and it feels like bit of a rip-off when you have minimal story content and then short DLC you have to fork out for too. I've always felt like, if a game sets me back $60, which is about a day's pay for me, then I should be able to put at least as many hours into it. That's not always realistic ( Fallout: New Vegas Ultimate cost me $20 and I've put over 300 hours into it, while I barely put two hours into Gone Home and it cost $30 all told [also, don't buy this game, because it sucks]). That said, Resident Evil 7 is incredibly shallow, and it's insulting to me in order to add more depth (not much, by all accounts, but some) I have to spend more money. Resident Evil 4,, 5, and 6 at least shipped with Mercenaries and that's I imagine where most of us spent time in those games; Re7 has nothing to do once you finish the main game, which is just sad.
|
|
Posts: 738
Original Join Date: May 20 2009
|
Post by Overseer on Feb 12, 2017 9:14:56 GMT 10
And also - the banned videos being pretty short seems pretty crappy to me. I don't know, I would prefer something longer in general but I may just have a bias as I prefer longer games over shorter ones. Probably because games are expensive over my way and it feels like bit of a rip-off when you have minimal story content and then short DLC you have to fork out for too. I've always felt like, if a game sets me back $60, which is about a day's pay for me, then I should be able to put at least as many hours into it. That's not always realistic ( Fallout: New Vegas Ultimate cost me $20 and I've put over 300 hours into it, while I barely put two hours into Gone Home and it cost $30 all told [also, don't buy this game, because it sucks]). That said, Resident Evil 7 is incredibly shallow, and it's insulting to me in order to add more depth (not much, by all accounts, but some) I have to spend more money. Resident Evil 4,, 5, and 6 at least shipped with Mercenaries and that's I imagine where most of us spent time in those games; Re7 has nothing to do once you finish the main game, which is just sad. 7 in my region was around $98-$109. Then the season pass is another $45. With or without the DLC, there is in no way the amount of content I can actively waste time with in it for that price. Instead of getting 7, someone actually gave me a copy of Final Fantasy XV as a gift and I chose to get the season pass despite knowing full well that XV wasn't complete and I've sunk 300 or so hours into it just taking screenshots or footage of the party doing stupid stuff because I actually formed an interest in the main party in comparison to still not giving a damn toward Ethan or Mia. I'm still playing RAID Mode, hell I'm still even playing Battle Game from the classic titles or even Master of Knifing on the DS version. It seems pretty bland to not have any sort of additional content, or the usual silly costumes and the like because it's not exactly possible to do with 7 as it is with their choice of styling for the game.
|
|
That's what I do. I game and I know things.
Posts: 104
|
Post by A Jaded Lizard on Feb 12, 2017 9:41:41 GMT 10
7 in my region was around $98-$109. Then the season pass is another $45. With or without the DLC, there is in no way the amount of content I can actively waste time with in it for that price. Instead of getting 7, someone actually gave me a copy of Final Fantasy XV as a gift and I chose to get the season pass despite knowing full well that XV wasn't complete and I've sunk 300 or so hours into it just taking screenshots or footage of the party doing stupid stuff because I actually formed an interest in the main party in comparison to still not giving a damn toward Ethan or Mia. I'm still playing RAID Mode, hell I'm still even playing Battle Game from the classic titles or even Master of Knifing on the DS version. It seems pretty bland to not have any sort of additional content, or the usual silly costumes and the like because it's not exactly possible to do with 7 as it is with their choice of styling for the game. Wow. If you don't mind me asking, where are you? That's highway robbery, pure and simple. I got it on sale from Greenman Gaming for $40 something, and the season pass was another $20, so I guess I should stop complaining about it being $60, but it's still about $20 more than it has any right to be. I've not beaten Raid in either game, in the first one because grinding and artificial difficulty, and in the second one because...I don't know, actually. I don't know I can run Re2 anymore without some janky futtzing around with Windows 10, so I've not tried. For that matter, I've not beaten Deadly Silence or the original Resident Evil at all...I guess I'm a bad fan since the only ones I've beaten are Re2, Re4, Re5, Re6, Re7, and Revelations (I'm on episode 4 of the second one now though thanks to talking to to you earlier, however). I don't really feel like my comparison to New Vegas is fair, since that game was the fully-realized, complete edition with all its DLCs, it's a really massive RPG already, and then there's all the mods. A more fair comparison would be another shooter, like Black Ops 2 or another survival horror game like Contagion, but I've put nearly 60 hours into BLOps 2 since I started playing it in November (between the endless varied campaign, Zombies, and regular multiplayer) and it cost $60 when I bought it, and I've put 33 hours into Contagion, a game which only cost me about $15 and is, again, a much bigger (and indie, no less) game. I guess my point is, even comparing apples to apples rather than apples to pizza, Re7 is still a really small, overpriced game. [/i]
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2017 10:09:14 GMT 10
Claire "I have a romance subplot in every game I'm in barring RE2" Redfield. Knowing Capcom they'll try to cram something like that down our throats in RE2. Also please god, I don't know if Ali Hillis voiced Claire in Rev2, but if she did, don't ever bring her back. You can clear all of Banned Footage Vol. 1 in about 2 hours, so it is kind of a rip-off. Especially jarring since I just got done clearing all of Battleborn's DLC, which took me about 20hrs because holy fuck Gearbox know how to make things replayable. I get the feeling this content WAS planned for the release, but was snipped to re-sell. They even cleared all mention of it from the files. What's worse, though, is that this content is all IRRELEVANT, so it's not only short in time but it's a WASTE of time too. As for the DLC - that's really shitty to hear that it only takes two hours. Though also given that ALL of the DLC was pretty much listed in the trial edition/demo data, I pulled the Nightmare DLC name reference and stuff before from it kind of proves it was pulled from release in a way. I don't know, in contrast like at least it's been admitted that Final Fantasy XV wasn't complete on launch and that they need to finish DLC, especially with VO recording sessions but the Bio7 stuff all seems to have been complete as there were trophy references and things in the data in general so it just seems very... Capcom as usual. Probably because there's a huge difference in transparency there. Square gave regular progress updates about XV and even implemented shit at fan requests (Manual photo taking, music on chocobo back). Capcom are just waving their hands going IT IS A MYSTERY.
|
|
Posts: 738
Original Join Date: May 20 2009
|
Post by Overseer on Feb 12, 2017 12:29:34 GMT 10
Wow. If you don't mind me asking, where are you? That's highway robbery, pure and simple. I got it on sale from Greenman Gaming for $40 something, and the season pass was another $20, so I guess I should stop complaining about it being $60, but it's still about $20 more than it has any right to be. I've not beaten Raid in either game, in the first one because grinding and artificial difficulty, and in the second one because...I don't know, actually. I don't know I can run Re2 anymore without some janky futtzing around with Windows 10, so I've not tried. For that matter, I've not beaten Deadly Silence[/] or the original Resident Evil at all...I guess I'm a bad fan since the only ones I've beaten are Re2, Re4, Re5, Re6, Re7, and Revelations (I'm on episode 4 of the second one now though thanks to talking to to you earlier, however).
I don't really feel like my comparison to New Vegas is fair, since that game was the fully-realized, complete edition with all its DLCs, it's a really massive RPG already, and then there's all the mods. A more fair comparison would be another shooter, like Black Ops 2 or another survival horror game like Contagion, but I've put nearly 60 hours into BLOps 2 since I started playing it in November (between the endless varied campaign, Zombies, and regular multiplayer) and it cost $60 when I bought it, and I've put 33 hours into Contagion, a game which only cost me about $15 and is, again, a much bigger (and indie, no less) game. I guess my point is, even comparing apples to apples rather than apples to pizza, Re7 is still a really small, overpriced game.
I'm usually in Australia, and relatives of mine that are more likely to get video games as gifts for me live in Australia and would've paid that price. That said, because I travel I have accounts for all major regions... the price disparity is kind of ridiculous. JP PC or PSN price for the dlc is 1,852 yen plus tax. So let's round up and assume it's 2,000 yen because I'm too lazy to log into my account and check prices. That's only $23 AUD. If I was to get it on Steam, then I'd either be put into USD or JPY, the USD price is $59.99 for the game and $29.99 for the season pass. Because of VALVe basically refusing to include AUD on the store despite NZD being made available, the currency conversion is in effect and brings it to roughly $80 USD for the standard game without the season pass. With the season pass it's $117 give or take, obviously not including currency conversion fees so then it goes up to $125 roughly. [Probably because there's a huge difference in transparency there. Square gave regular progress updates about XV and even implemented shit at fan requests (Manual photo taking, music on chocobo back). Capcom are just waving their hands going IT IS A MYSTERY. Yeah, that's exactly why I ended up getting the season pass for it in the first place. The fact that they've actively taken feedback for it has certainly given a positive view towards it despite shipping incomplete. In all honesty, that's the perfect way to put it for Capcom!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2017 13:15:05 GMT 10
[Probably because there's a huge difference in transparency there. Square gave regular progress updates about XV and even implemented shit at fan requests (Manual photo taking, music on chocobo back). Capcom are just waving their hands going IT IS A MYSTERY. Yeah, that's exactly why I ended up getting the season pass for it in the first place. The fact that they've actively taken feedback for it has certainly given a positive view towards it despite shipping incomplete. In all honesty, that's the perfect way to put it for Capcom! I didn't get it at launch, because I didn't like FFXV on my first run. But it grew on me, and the developers/cast caring for the game convinced me to get the SP.
|
|